New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

Re: wondering out loud

By TheAdmiral
2/23/2021 7:06 am
I like the premise of a 50+ minimum and a 65+ potential (60 would be enough). There are two alternative reasons to have a 'crappy' QB though

1. A Kick Holder - only on the roster to hold kicks and play at QB on the rare occasion a starter is injured.

2. Has the attributes to play in a different position (Taysom Hill) where he can play RB/FB/TE and again would merely be an emergency option if the starter is injured.

Re: wondering out loud

By Chandyo
2/23/2021 8:43 am
TheAdmiral wrote:
I like the premise of a 50+ minimum and a 65+ potential (60 would be enough). There are two alternative reasons to have a 'crappy' QB though

1. A Kick Holder - only on the roster to hold kicks and play at QB on the rare occasion a starter is injured.

2. Has the attributes to play in a different position (Taysom Hill) where he can play RB/FB/TE and again would merely be an emergency option if the starter is injured.


I agree here but I don’t think that calls for concern unless one of us see that player in the QB1 spot, right?