wondering out loud

Re: wondering out loud by TheAdmiral @ 2/23/2021 7:06 am I like the premise of a 50+ minimum and a 65+ potential (60 would be enough). There are two alternative reasons to have a 'crappy' QB though 1. A Kick Holder - only on the roster to hold kicks and play at QB on the rare occasion a starter is injured. 2. Has the attributes to play in a different position (Taysom Hill) where he can play RB/FB/TE and again would merely be an emergency option if the starter is injured. Liked by Pernbronze, shavar, frank

Re: wondering out loud by Chandyo @ 2/23/2021 8:43 am TheAdmiral wrote: I like the premise of a 50+ minimum and a 65+ potential (60 would be enough). There are two alternative reasons to have a 'crappy' QB though 1. A Kick Holder - only on the roster to hold kicks and play at QB on the rare occasion a starter is injured. 2. Has the attributes to play in a different position (Taysom Hill) where he can play RB/FB/TE and again would merely be an emergency option if the starter is injured. I agree here but I don’t think that calls for concern unless one of us see that player in the QB1 spot, right? Liked by Pernbronze, frank