Yup i just notice that smh

its not that big of a deal here at Ultimate Legend headquarters. none of the picks or players involved have much potential for impact. and the pick that was traded has already been used..... we arent going backwards

weird trade but no big deal. Greene wanted out of Nashville. seems maybe his erratic behavior at event was a case of him acting out due to trade request not being met

apparently he started a food fight during the after party of a Bobcat golf fundraiser. there was ambrosia salad everywhere

pretty much. to me, in MFN RO, QBs are like Ps & Ks. i dont mess with a QB with less than stellar pass accuracy. i am not aware of how other attributes effect their play. almost all QBs in this league snck with more INTs than TDs

edit: just learned cant use the word "s u c k" in MFN.....but "blows" is okay

I've seen stranger exchanges in the past... two first rounds and a third for two second, a third and a fourth... in terms of values, it doesn't make any sense. Good Game for all.

That one killed me :D

The actual value was there. I felt the players in round 2 had the same value as the late first rounders I tend to get in that draft. That draft was deep. 10 of the 13 players are still on my roster with several of them quality starter level. Regardless of how he drafts I feel I came out even at worst in the trade. I also had/have a need to get younger quicker due to aging players which currently has me scrambling to plug holes after 7 players retired and several others too old to resign left for free agency. Not all drafts have the same value.

in the case that there was a trade during the draft that warranted a cancel.....how does that work? anyone ever dealt with that b4?

example: pick 1.16 was traded for a player who wasnt close to being worth it, but admin was aware of it after the pick already happened. how is that handled? seems to me if it was possible to veto then it would mess everything up. the entire draft would have to be redrafted from that point, no? it wouldnt be good for the entire league

If it's after the fact I'd say another trade to reach appropriate compensation levels as a whole would be the best option if vetoes are no longer doable or practical.

thank you for brainstorming but i do not believe that would work out.....especially for me having to be a part of mitigation

could go sideways fast. if they are asked to add something, the "winning" owner could claim that they wouldnt have made the trade at all. that route could be viewed as penalization

hopefully we never have to deal with that....just wondering if anyone ever saw that happen in a league

I've seen it a couple times but it's usually been voluntary after a admin contacted both parties and asked for a balancing trade. As you said it's something that can't really be forced but I'd like to think most owners would do so voluntarily for significant issues.